Best News Stories & Information

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

The Crown & Treason

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crown

The Crown is a corporation sole that in the Commonwealth realms, as well as in any provincial or state sub-divisions thereof, represents the legal embodiment of governance, whether executive, legislative, or judicial. It evolved naturally first in the United Kingdom as a separation of the literal crown and property of the nation state from the person and personal property of the monarch; a concept which then spread via British colonisation and is now rooted in the legal lexicon of the other 15 independent realms. In this context it should not be confused with any physical crown, such as those of the British state regalia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation_sole

A corporation sole is a legal entity consisting of a single ('sole') incorporated office, occupied by a single ('sole') man or woman. This allows a corporation (usually a religious corporation) to pass vertically in time from one office holder to the next successor-in-office, giving the position legal continuity with each subsequent office holder having identical powers to his predecessor.

The Monarch of the Commonwealth realms is a corporation sole – she or he may possess property as monarch which is distinct from the property he or she possesses personally, and may do acts as monarch distinguished from their personal acts. In fact, Elizabeth II has several corporations sole – Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the United Kingdom, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Australia are all distinct corporations sole.

The concept of corporation sole originated as a means to the orderly transfer of church or religious society property, serving to keep title within the church or religious society. In order to keep the religious property from being treated as the estate of the vicar of the church, the property was titled to the office of the corporation sole. In the case of the Roman Catholic Church, the property is usually titled to the diocesan bishop, who serves in the office of the corporation sole. The Roman Catholic Church continues to use the corporation sole for holding title for property, and as recently as 2002, split a Californian diocese into many, smaller corporations sole, with each parish priest becoming his own corporation sole, thus limiting the liability of the diocese.

The Monarch of the Commonwealth realms is a corporation sole – she or he may possess property as monarch which is distinct from the property he or she possesses personally, and may do acts as monarch distinguished from their personal acts. In fact, Elizabeth II has several corporations sole – Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the United Kingdom, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Australia are all distinct corporations sole. Because Australia and Canada have federal systems of government, Elizabeth also has a distinct corporation sole for each of the Australian states and Canadian provinces - for example, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Queensland and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario.

http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/Corporation/LGNL_Services/Leisure_and_culture/Local_history_and_heritage/Buildings_within_the_City/Mansion_house/History+of+the+Government+of+the+City+of+London.htm

The right of the City Of London to run its own affairs was gradually won as concessions were gained from the Crown.
the Charter granted by William the Conqueror in 1067, in which he promised to recognise the rights, privileges and laws that the City had enjoyed since the time of Edward the Confessor (1042-62).

London, like other cities, was subject to the authority of the Crown through its Sheriff,
In 1191, the commune was officially recognised by Prince John, while his brother Richard the Lionheart was away at the Crusades, and in 1199 John, now King, granted the citizens of London the right to elect their own Sheriffs - a particularly significant right as the Sheriff was the King's representative through whom the City was governed. The citizens' right to elect a Mayor annually was granted by King John in a charter of 1215.

http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/Corporation/LGNL_Services/Council_and_democracy/Councillors_democracy_and_elections/The_Lord_Mayor/
The Lord Mayor of the City of London
Alderman Michael Bear, Lord Mayor of the City of London The City of London is one of the world’s leading international finance centres. As head of the City of London Corporation, which provides business and local government services to the City, the Lord Mayor of London's principal role today is ambassador for all UK-based financial and professional services. The Lord Mayor of London is not the Mayor of (Greater) London.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason
In law, treason is the crime that covers some of the more serious acts of betrayal of one's sovereign or nation. Historically, treason also covered the murder of specific social superiors, such as the murder of a husband by his wife. Treason against the king was known as high treason and treason against a lesser superior was petit treason. A person who commits treason is known in law as a traitor.

Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an endeavour.

Outside legal spheres, the word "traitor" may also be used to describe a person who betrays (or is accused of betraying) their own political party, nation, family, friends, ethnic group, team, religion, social class, or other group to which they may belong. Often, such accusations are controversial and disputed, as the person may not identify with the group of which they are a member, or may otherwise disagree with the group leaders making the charge. See, for example, race traitor.

At times, the term "traitor" has been levelled as a political epithet, regardless of any verifiable treasonable action. In a civil war or insurrection, the winners may deem the losers to be traitors. Likewise the term "traitor" is used in heated political discussion – typically as a slur against political dissidents, or against officials in power who are perceived as failing to act in the best interest of their constituents. In certain cases, as with the German Dolchsto├člegende, the accusation of treason towards a large group of people can be a unifying political message.

In English law, high treason was punishable by being hanged, drawn and quartered (men) or burnt at the stake (women), or beheading (royalty and nobility). Treason was the only crime which attracted those penalties (until they were abolished in 1814, 1790 and 1973 respectively). The penalty was used by later monarchs against people who could reasonably be called traitors, although most modern jurists would call it excessive. Many of them would now just be considered dissidents.

Australia
Section 80.1 of the Criminal Code, contained in the schedule of the Criminal Code Act 1995, defines treason as follows:
(f) engages in conduct that assists by any means whatever, with intent to assist:

(i) another country; or
(ii) an organisation;
(h) forms an intention to do any act referred to in a preceding paragraph and manifests that intention by an overt act."


Basically if you DEMAND that your "A LIVING CONSCIOUS BEING WHO IS FAR MORE THEN WORDS OR A BIRTH CERTIFICATE PERSON", THEN THE SYSTEM HAS NO AUTHORITY AND WILL EITHER ABUSE AND BREAK THE NATURAL LAW OR WILL GIVE YOU RESPECT AND TREAT YOU AS A LIVING CONSCIOUSNESS BEING! WHO IS RULER OF THEMSELVES AND AS LONG AS THEY ARE NOT A THREAT OF HARM OR CAUSE HARM TO ANYONE THEY ARE FREE!

He Was let go, Case was Dropped, If your Sovereign the "State" has no authority until you Hurt someone! If you stay Moral and TRUE Freedom is available, if your spineless and you back-down and submit to them, giving them authority you will be controlled and bullied by those who use your ignorance against you...

If you Film it , or have United Nations International Court Law Ambassadors in the Court, IT IS TREASON for the Judge to make a FOREIGN BRITISH QUEEN SOVEREIGN OVER YOU IN AUSTRALIA!
The CROWN has NO Authority If your A FREE INDEPENDENT MORAL SOVEREIGN INDIVIDUAL

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_individual


It Is Treason for anyone to make an Oath of Loyalty to another Country or Organization,
or to Assist a Foreign power to Influence Affairs in ones own Country
the Manifestation of CORPORATE AUSTRALIA & States , RULED BY A FOREIGN BRITISH QUEEN, and the Requirement of all Police, Judges, Lawyers, Politicians to Make an Oath of Loyalty to this Foreign power is an Abomination of Australian Sovereign Independence

Section 80.1 of the Criminal Code, contained in the schedule of the Criminal Code Act 1995, defines treason as follows:
(f) engages in conduct that assists by any means whatever, with intent to assist:

(i) another country; or
(ii) an organisation;
(h) forms an intention to do any act referred to in a preceding paragraph and manifests that intention by an overt act."

United Nations General Assembly's proclamation on 14 December 1960 of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples - resolution 1514 (XV).
http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/152/88/IMG/NR015288.pdf?OpenElement

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronation_of_the_British_monarch
The ceremony is performed by the Archbishop of Canterbury, the most senior cleric of the Church of England.
During the English Reformation 1688 the Church of England broke away from the authority of the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church, at first temporarily under Henry VIII and Edward VI and later permanently during the reign of Elizabeth I.


http://shundrallah.blogspot.com/2011/01/english-origination-peasant-revoloution.html
Note : The people Woke up in 1381 and the Revolution Involved Hunting down and Killing those who would CONTROL them and FORCE THEM TO SUBMIT

In 1381 the Peasant Revolt : Revolution was in the air of the English Speaking "Working Class"
30 May 1381 Tax Collector Sent to collect a New tax for the Pope and King to go to war, was sent packing by the Local Villagers of Fobbing
2 June 1381 Chief Justice : Robert Belknap Dispatched to Investigate was attacked at Brentwood, By this time, the violent discontent had spread, and the counties of Essex and Kent were in full revolt.
Soon people moved on London in an armed uprising.
Instead of a full-scale riot, there were only systematic attacks on certain properties, many of them associated with John of Gaunt and/or the Hospitaller Order.

The People had Awoken to the Deception of CONTROL
THE PEOPLE KNEW WHO TO TARGET
THE ROYAL BLOODLINE AND THE POPE'S SECRET SOCIETY HOSPITALLER ORDER

STORMING THE TOWER OF LONDON
At the same time, a group of rebels stormed the Tower of London and summarily executed those hiding there, including the Lord Chancellor (Simon of Sudbury, the Archbishop of Canterbury, who was particularly associated with the poll tax), and the Lord Treasurer (Robert de Hales, the Grand Prior of the Knights Hospitallers of England). The Savoy Palace of the king's uncle John of Gaunt was one of the London buildings destroyed by the rioters.

In 1382 1 Year later the Pope had a Solution
John Wycliffe Translated the bible in to English
Limiting the Words Available to "Peasants" to Explain effective Communication translations of Words that were not yet Created for Use like, Deception, Control, Puppeteering, Manipulation, Obfuscation, Consciousness, Free-Will, Willpower, Empowerment, Freedom

*** Apparently The Reformation of CONTROL, Included Annexing the Church Papal Coronation Along with Creating a Limited Language for the Peasants *** It was Far More Obvious in California when Thousands of Claims of Child Rape were Exposed Inside the church ***

Will the people Fall for the Same tricks "Re-Mask to put at Arms length while retaining centralized Control" this time, Or will REVOLUTION bring real FREEDOM?

No comments:

Post a Comment