Ehrlich and Holdren: Death “Reasonable Price to Pay” for Well-being of Society

http://www.infowars.com/ehrlich-and-holdren-death-reasonable-price-to-pay-for-well-being-of-society/

“a small net increase in deaths” is “a reasonable price to pay”

Redoubling efforts to halt the growth of the human population and eventually reduce it

Instituting worldwide campaigns to emphasize limiting the number of sexual partners, and to increase the use of condoms and spermicides. Such changes would both lower the incidence of STDs and encourage the evolution of reduced virulence in them (Ewald, 1994). Special attention should be paid to methods that can be adopted by women (e.g., Rosenberg and Gollub, 1992; Rosenberg et al., 1992, 1993), which would tie in neatly to related methods of improving the epidemiological environment by limiting human population growth (Ehrlich et al., 1995).

From Ehrlich we switch gears to John P. Holdren, who authored (also with Paul Ehrlich) an article called “The Meaning of Sustainability: Biogeophysical Aspects” in the World Bank document Defining and Measuring Sustainability. In the article, the diabolical duo propose a stark reduction in the percentage of humans on earth:

“No form of material growth (including population growth) other than asymptotic growth, is sustainable; Many of the practices inadequately supporting today’s population of 5.5 billion people are sustainable; and at the sustainability limit, there will be a trade-off between population and energy-matter throughput per person, hence, ultimately, between economic activity per person and well-being per person.”

“This”, Holdren and Ehrlich continue, “is enough to say quite a lot about what needs to be faced up to eventually (a world of zero net physical growth), what should be done now (change unsustainable practices, reduce excessive material consumption, slow down population growth),and what the penalty will be for postponing attention to population limitation (lower well-being per person.”

The most gruesome and interesting part of their elucidation is buried in the notes (page 15). In speaking about all kinds of intolerable “harms” that counteract sustainability, Holdren and Ehrlich are willing to make an exception for pollution, if it will cut some time of the average life expectancy:

“Harm that would qualify as tolerable, in this context, could not be cumulative, else continuing additions to it would necessarily add up to unsustainable damage eventually. Thus, for example, a form and level of pollution that subtract a month from the life expectancy of the average member of the human population, or that reduce the net primary productivity of forests on the planet by 1 percent, might be deemed tolerable in exchange for very large benefits and would certainly be sustainable as long as the loss of life expectancy or reduction in productivity did not grow with time. Two of us have coined the term “maximum sustainable abuse” in the course of grappling with such ideas (Daily and Ehrlich 1992).”

In the horrible euphemistic way these proposals disguised as “possibilities” are usually being presented lies hidden a horrible truth. These head-hunters of the scientific dictatorship are not simply powerless psychopaths exchanging abstract ideas. They are powerful sociopaths rather, occupying key positions within the marble halls of academia and government. In the final equation, they are after you and your children.

James Frederick Ferrier 1808-1884

I found an old copy of Lectures on Greek Philosophy in a second hand bookshop, Its now my personal favorite, Ferrier is a Hero and pioneer of Metaphysics, Coining the term epistemology in institutes of metaphysics, my personal favorite quote is :

"Philosophy being, according to our definition, that science which aims at the attainment of absolute truth, that is of truth as it exists, not for some, but for all intelligence"

"It was not truth for some, truth acquired through the particular faculty, that was now aimed at, it was rather truth for all : Truth for which every mind could and must respond"

Free Downloads
Vol 1 : Institutes of Metaphysic the Theory of Knowing and Being (1854)
http://www.archive.org/details/institutesmetap02ferrgoog
Vol 2 : Lectures on Greek philosophy
http://www.archive.org/details/philosophicalwor02ferruoft
Vol 3 : Philosophical works of the late James Frederick Ferrier
http://www.archive.org/details/philosophicalwor03ferruoft



http://www.scottishphilosophy.org/jamesfrederickferrier.html

James Frederick Ferrier was born on 16 June 1808 to a prominent Edinburgh family – his aunt was the novelist Susan Ferrier, and under the alias ‘Christopher North’ his uncle, Professor John Wilson, was one of 19th century Britain’s leading men of letters.

Ferrier was educated at the High School of Edinburgh and Greenwich School outside London. In 1825 he enrolled at the University of Edinburgh where he studied for two years before becoming a Fellow Commoner at Magdalen College, Oxford from which he graduated in 1832. It was during his last year there that he met Sir William Hamilton.

Ferrier returned to Edinburgh, entered the ‘Faculty of Advocates’ and began work as a lawyer in 1833, but having little interest in a legal career, he continued his philosophical studies, and in 1837 published his first article in Blackwood’s Magazine. This article – ‘An Introduction to the Philosophy of Consciousness’ – appeared in instalments over seven issues and established Ferrier as a contributor to philosophical discussion in Scotland.

In 1841 Ferrier was appointed Professor of Civil History at the University of Edinburgh where he developed a close intellectual and personal relationship with Sir William Hamilton on whose recommendation he was appointed Professor of Moral Philosophy and Political Economy at the University of St Andrews. In 1854 he published his major work the Institutes of Metaphysic.

In 1853 Ferrier applied to Edinburgh University for the Chair of Moral Philosophy and then again in 1856, when Sir William Hamilton died, for the Chair of Logic and Metaphysics. Neither application was successful, partly because of the mixed reception the Institutes had received. The second competition was acrimonious and prompted Ferrier to publish a short work Scottish Philosophy: the Old and the New, in which he defended his philosophy as properly Scottish despite his express rejection of the School of Common Sense.

James Frederick Ferrier spent his final years revising his lectures on Greek philosophy, which were published after his death. From 1857 onward Ferrier’s health declined and he died in St Andrews on 11 June 1864. His collected works were published in three volumes in 1875.

Ferrier’s essay on Berkeley was regarded in his own lifetime as possibly his best piece of work. In it he rejects an idea fundamental to Reid’s Inquiry, that the philosophy of mind was led off course by assumptions Berkeley had made widespread. Instead, Ferrier argues for a return to Berkeley but at the same time insists that this is in accord with the principles of common sense. In this way he gives a new turn to the Scottish philosophical tradition.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Frederick_Ferrier

Handbook suggests that deviations from 'normality' are disorders

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/26/AR2010022603369.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

The fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), psychiatry's encyclopedia of supposed mental "disorders," is being revised.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/10/AR2010021000009.html

Children who throw too many tantrums could be diagnosed with "temper dysregulation with dysphoria." Teenagers who are particularly eccentric might be candidates for treatment for "psychosis risk syndrome." Men who are just way too interested in sex face being labeled as suffering from "hypersexual disorder."

These are among dozens of proposals being unveiled Wednesday by the American Psychiatric Association in the first complete revision since 1994 of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or "DSM" -- the massive tome that has served as the bible for modern psychiatry for more than half a century.

"It not only determines how mental disorders are diagnosed, it can impact how people see themselves and how we see each other," said Alan Schatzberg, the association's president. "It influences how research is conducted as well as what is researched. . . . It affects legal matters, industry and government programs."

The proposals will be debated in an intense process over the next two years, with potentially billions of dollars at stake for pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, government health plans, doctors, researchers and patient advocacy groups.

But perhaps more important, the outcome will help shape which emotions, behaviors, thoughts and personality traits society considers part of the natural spectrum of the human persona and which are considered pathological, requiring treatment and possibly even criminal punishment.

FASCISM "You really think it'll be this obvious?"

Context, Syntax

Context, Syntax

If 100 is compared to 75
The context, Syntax Defines the % Ratio
100 Dropping to 75 is a 25% loss
75 increasing to 100 is a 33.3% gain
75 is 75% of 100
100 is 100% of 100
Now if the Origin point is 100 then 75 increasing back to 100 is the same 100 Origin point and 0% change
If 75 is the Origin point then 100 decreasing to 75 is back to the same 75 origin point and 0% change again

This is where it gets tricky, Without Direction only a Focus point all possibilities are relevant
If 100 is the point of origin then 75 is seen as
25% loss or -25%, 33.3% gain or +33.3%, 75%, and both 75 and 100 are seen as 0% change to there own state regardless of the origin
If 75 is the Point of Origin then 100 is seen as
25% loss or -25%, 33.3% gain or +33.3%, 75%, and both 75 and 100 are seen as 0% change to there own state regardless of the origin

The Real Tricky part is in the use of Combination, Separation, and Multiplication...
100 can be Added, Subtracted, Multiplied, or Divided by 75
75 can be added, subtracted, multiplied, or divided by 100
The % these Ratios give are going to blow your mind, remember same Variables 75 and 100, yet Context and Syntax changed
100 added to 75 is 175 = +75% and 175%
100 subtracted from 75 is -25 = -125% or subtract 75 is 25 = 25%
100 Multiplied by 75 is 7500 = 7500% or +7400%
100 divided by 75 is 1.33 = 1.33%

75 Added to 100 is 175 = +75% and 175%
75 Subtracted from 100 is 25 = 25%
75 multiplied by 100 is 7500 = 7500% or +7400%
75 Divided by 100 = .75 or 1%

So just from the Simple Application of Mathematical Context, Syntax to 75 and 100 has resulted in % variables between -125% , to 7500%
If the Directional Context, Syntax is lost or misplaced but the % variable is retained then mixed with other syntax or Context's the Entire Perception Generated is Defective... and Hazardous...

If we add just one piece of Directional Focus to explain Context, Syntax Direction is Understood
A Point of origin dose not give the other Value a point of reference and so all its possible relationships are relevant
This means that the Relevance of DEPTH Perception Graded in an Orderly Understandable Fashion is the core or Syntax, Context
The Ability to Linguistically Communicate Syntax and Context Effectively is the core of Effective Translation

Without the relationship between values explained a point of origin : is like your home "point of origin" and if your at a different location and lost with no known relationship between the points all Possibilities are relevant yet irrelevant at the same time, until the relationship between points is explained and understood only then will the clear picture of different locations be one set obvious Context, Syntax rather then the mass of possible yet irrelevant uses of syntax, context without any factual or tangible variables that can correlate such a syntax, context Reinforcement or reliability over the other possibilities, nor rule the others out

a point of origin : is also like the amount of $ your house costs, while your current $ is different yet no context or syntax has been established are you still saving for the house so its a future point/plan/dream, or is it long in the past, It is being purchased, or sold? telling someone "house X$ i got y$ dose nothing to explain how the values relate

However if the Directional focus is taken to be irrelevant as in the use of semantics, Or Statistical Tricks then the (+/-) % is used to mask the underlying goal and the true intentional Context, Syntax Direction is being obfuscated through deliberate miss-perception reinforcement



Every Day, the Media, Advertising, Politics, Education, and Religions use a Mish-Mash of Spaghetti Syntax, Context to Confuse, Dumb-Down, and Program the Re-Education of Society to Parrot and Conform to Hypocrisy through CONSENSUS

This is why the Analysts, Intelligence operatives, Independent Critical thinkers who have the Intelligence, focus and will-power to find-out and understand are not so easy to SENSE CON like the rest of US

Fifth column

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_column

A fifth column is a group of people who clandestinely undermine a larger group such as a nation from within, to help an external enemy.

Origin

The term originated with a 1936 radio address by Emilio Mola, a Nationalist General during the 1936–39 Spanish Civil War. As his army approached Madrid, a message was broadcast that the four columns of his forces outside the city would be supported by a "fifth column" of his supporters inside the city, intent on undermining the Republican government from within (see Siege of Madrid). The term was used as the title of Ernest Hemingway's only play, which he wrote while the city was being bombarded; the play was published in 1938 in his book The Fifth Column and the First Forty-Nine Stories.

In fact, this supposed "fifth column" did not prove very effective, as demonstrated by the fact that Madrid held out until 1939 despite very heavy fighting. Nevertheless, the term caught on and was used extensively, especially by those fighting the Fascists and Nazis.

The term was in wide use in Britain in the early stages of the Second World War where the fear of the fifth Column was used as justification for the mass internment, on the Isle of Man, of German nationals who resided in the United Kingdom. The United States and Canada interned U.S. and Canadian citizens of Japanese, German, and Italian descent around the same time (early 1940s), using similar justification.

Usage

With the grain requisition crises, famines, troubled economic conditions, and international destabilization in the 1930s, the leaders of the Soviet Union became increasingly worried about the possible disloyalty of diaspora ethnic groups with cross-border ties (especially Finns, Germans and Poles), residing along its western borders; this eventually led to the start of Stalin's repressive policies towards them, most notably to the national operations of the NKVD and forced population transfer.

In Europe, German minority organizations in Poland and Czechoslovakia formed the Selbstschutz and the Sudeten German Free Corps respectively , which actively helped the Third Reich in conquering those nations. After 1945, this was cited as justification for the wholesale expulsion of ethnic Germans from Czechoslovakia, Poland and the Soviet Union, as well as return to these countries of territories which had been annexed by Germany.

Modern usage

• North Koreans in Japan, particularly those affiliated to Chongryun (which is affiliated to the government of North Korea) may sometimes be seen this way by some Japanese and have been the victims of verbal and physical attacks, more frequently since the government of Kim Jong Il acknowledged it had abducted Japanese nationals and tested ballistic missiles.
• Some Israeli Jews, including politicians, rabbis, journalists, and even historians, have referred to the Arab citizens of Israel, 20% of Israel's population within the pre-1967 borders who are Arabs, as being a "fifth column" inside the State of Israel as Arab Israelis frequently identify more with the Palestinian cause of an independent state.

Pop culture

• Author and Radio Personality Michael Savage frequently claims that in the United States the Fourth Estate has now become the Fifth Column
• In the NBC mini-series, TV series & ABC TV series adaptions of V, a group of rebel aliens and humans call themselves "The Fifth Column".
• In the television series Stargate SG-1, the Jaffa resistance is sometimes referred to as the "Jaffa Fifth Column".
• In the MMORPG City of Heroes, the Fifth Column are a Nazi-themed terrorist organisation that has infiltrated the United States.
• Ernest Hemingway wrote a propaganda play in 1937 entitled The Fifth Column about the Spanish Civil War.
• The "Fifth Column" was a recurring nemesis for the Green Lama in the 1940s pulp stories.
• In the television series Jeremiah, forces of the Army of Daniel that infiltrated the Thunder Mountain complex of the Western Alliance were referred to as the "Fifth Column".
• The Agenda, a current affairs television program aired by TVOntario has a blog colled "The Fifth Column"

Note : Between the Re-Education Indoctrination, and the Current Strategic Systematic Global Agenda, Terrorists are today's Targets Labeled as "A Group of people who Morally Resist and Undermine the GLOBAL GOVERNMENT, GLOBAL RULER SHIP, GLOBAL SUBMISSION, GLOBAL CONTROL SYSTEM. The Conditioning process is aimed to gain subconscious support for the Detainment and persecution of anyone with the attitude they are Morally FREE of the Larger Corrupt Group "Global Governance Agenda", Enticing the Mentality of the Followers of the Larger Group of Global Governance Indoctrinated Puppets to Justify INTERNMENT of others who do not Submit and Follow the "Global Governance Agenda"

Freedom, Escaping the Matrix, Quadruple Integrity Mentality

If a Free man is not of a Quadruple Mentality his Delusional and already a Serf to the System...

When a Freeman is Captured, Indoctrinated and Re-Educated, he becomes a part of the System...
When a Freeman joins the system with his integrity intact, with the mask of the system used to blend in he is a double agent...
Of course the System knows about Double agents and has Triple agents who are part of the system that act like they are FREE to the System Insiders to gain trust and intelligence on the Double agents...
Their for only the Quadruple Freeman is on the lookout for such Scheming and is on guard for such a Triple cross...

Their for only those who are free with the Mentality that is aware of Infiltrators infiltrating Freedom movements within an oppressive indoctrinating control system are really FREE, the rest are just a Compartmentalized part of the system...

This is whats meant by Escaping the MATRIX...