Port Arthur Shooter Michael Charles Dyson Police Officer Anti-Terror Taskforce! FALCE FLAG to take guns away from australian people

http://shundrallah.blogspot.com/2011/02/i-am-safe-australian-government-website.html

http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=106707306036075

Why Michael Charles Dyson??
by Martin Bryant is Innocent - Michael Charles Dyson shooter at Seascape on Wednesday, April 7, 2010 at 3:02am
POINT: The Port Arthur Massacre was a planned event from start to finish.

The actions of the various players such as McCreadie, Groom, Easton, Sale and many others tells us that the Port Arthur Massacre was a terrorist exercise from the start. Every major police member involved with the Port Arthur Massacre had been trained by SAC-PAV, a Federal Government body from the Federal Attorney General’s Department and controlled by the PCSS.

Consider these snippets of information:
“A revised edition of the National Anti-Terrorist Plan endorsed by SAC-PAV in November 1995”

“For example, the effectiveness of the national Anti-Terrorist Plan and particularly the external support provisions was demonstrated during the Port Arthur incident in April 1996.”

“the response arrangements of the National Anti-Terrorist Plan were largely followed by the Tasmanian Authorities in successfully managing the incident.”

So, the plans that Superintendent Bob Fielding signed off on were in fact, part of the National Anti-Terrorist Plan endorsed by SAC-PAV in November 1995. The Plans to accommodate the media, especially with the buses, and the organised tours then also had to be part of the National Anti-Terrorist Plan. The next question is, who wrote these plans?

Consider the career of the retired Tasmania Police Sergeant, Michael Charles Dyson. Michael Charles Dyson joined the Tasmania Police in 1974, and the SOG in 1985. In 1990 as a senior member and the only full-time member of Tasmania Police SOG, Sgt Michael Dyson, at the time with 16 years policing experience, and 5 of those years with the SOG, was seconded to train New Zealand police officers at the New Zealand Police College near Dunedin for their inclusion in their Armed Offenders Squad (AOS) It was reported in New Zealand, that in regard to the Aramoana massacre on the 13th November 1990, “an anti terrorist unit was in the area helping to co-ordinate the scene.” Apparently Sgt Dyson was part of this anti-terrorist team.

Mr Dyson was the Assault Team Commander at Pelverata involved in the shooting death of Joe Gilowitz who was shot by Constable Michael Fogarty.

Interestingly, we learn from the Inquiry transcript, that when Michael Dyson left the SOG unit in 1995 - before the Port Arthur terrorist attack - he was posted to a special section in the Tasmania Police who were involved directly in, “counter terrorist exercises”. It was in this rather covert section, that Dyson spent his remaining time in Tasmania Police, being “involved in the development of the violent incident management plan.” (VIMPs)- “more strategic level and became involved in the overall command of violent incidents which is my passion…”

In other words, Sgt Dyson in the 2000 Royal Commission told us that he was posted to a unit directly involved in ‘ Counter Terrorist exercises’, and that he was involved in that unit’s planning aspect for ‘Violent Incident Management Plan’ the plans mentioned and used by Superintendent Fielding, Geoff Easton, and all the other players in Australia’s worst massacre. Dyson describes his move as a ‘more strategic level’, and then describes his involvement in regard to command of violent incidents as a passion. I would suspect that he means his passion would be in regard to the command and management of violent incidents rather than the victim thereof, so consider this aspect.

In regard to the Port Arthur Massacre, the most violent incident ever to occur within Australia, let alone Tasmania, the first and only time that the Plans for an ‘Anti-Terrorist’ situation were implemented, Sergeant Michael Dyson, the former SOG Assault Team Leader, the only SOG member with any siege experience, was not available to assist the SOG’s in their part of the exercise, and the required drills that had been planned by Dyson.

Dyson would have known the area around Seascape, having previously been involved with the various SOG training exercises carried out in the area, he would have been aware of all the difficulties such as topography and radio communications that would beset the SOG’s, but it appears that Dyson’s passion would not be fulfilled on that particular day or was it?

We are aware that Martin Bryant had a mate with him in Seascape Cottage, a mate called Rick. When we read of the various comments made by Martin in regard to Rick, then we become aware that they were old mates, and perhaps they had even shot together at one of the various shooting ranges in the area. We are also aware that whoever was with Martin, that person was well aware of the various tactics and drills performed by the Tasmania Police SOG’s, and had similar equipment to the SOG’s such as night viewing equipment, and laser sights. This equipment was not discovered in the charred ruins of Seascape Cottage, and so presumably must have left with ‘Rick’.

It is questionable as to why Martin Bryant changed his clothing at least three times, as his clothing on the journey to Port Arthur was different to the clothing worn by the gunman at the Historic Site, and when Martin Bryant emerged from Seascape he was dressed in black. Funnily enough the SOG’S were also dressed in black. Is it beyond the realms of possibility that Rick was also dressed in Black?
But, back to Martin Bryant in Seascape and talking with the Police Negotiator;

Jamie: Yeah, while I’m on the phone um Rick’s wondering how did the ABC actually get in touch with me.

McCarthy: Rick was Rick actually wondering that?

Now this little comment by ‘Jamie’ or Martin Bryant if you wish does tend to demonstrate that he had an easy friendly relationship with Rick, but now consider this little gem

Jamie: Uh well I’m well up til now and the past few twenty seconds. What I’ve actually found out man is that one of your boys is right outside North East I’d say. With an infra-red scope. I’ve got one up here that I’ve found from this person own um owns this property, he’s shining right towards me. If he doesn’t leave can you just ask him to move on, cause he’s gonna shoot he’s trying to shoot he’s gonna shoot your main man.”

Now the questions to be asked here are just who was ‘Jamie’ concerned about getting shot by the SOG marksman, as ‘Jamie’ infers that the target is someone other than himself, and thus more than likely, Rick. But it is the description of the target to the Tasmania Police Negotiator, in that the marksman was going to shoot the Tasmania Police’s main man. That man has to be Rick, and ‘Jamie’ has just told us that Rick was a main member of the Tasmania Police.

My question tonight is, “What is the possibility that the person inside Seascape Cottage with Martin Bryant, aka ‘Jamie, who ‘Jamie’ called Rick actually being a Tasmania Police SOG member by the name of Mick.

Mick even made a FALCE STATEMENT, which is proven to have many holes in it
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48694068/Fake-Tasmania-Police-Statement

Wake up, There is an Abomination Insidiously Infesting the Police and Government with Corruption....

I AM SAFE Australian Government Website Proof the Australian Government is making people DISAPEAR

Anti-Terrorism Bill (No. 2) 2005 is the one that is incorporated in the explanatory memorandum: ‘I» «am» «safe but unable to be contacted for the time being.’
http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;page=0;query=%22I%20AM%20SAFE%22;rec=3;resCount=Default

Anti-Terrorism Bill (No. 2) 2005

http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2FR2469%22;querytype=;rec=0
Page 71
but solely for the purposes of letting the person contacted know that the person being detained is safe but is not able to be contacted for the time being.


WAKE UP AUSTRALIA THE GESTAPO IS HERE!


Or will you only Realize when you see this? By then its to LATE!


Now it seems SCARY that AUSTRALIA was the FIRST COUNTRY TO DISARM ITS PEOPLE SINCE HITLER IN WW2,
Yet it was Eisenhower who killed over 1.7 million Germans AFTER THE WAR!


Its time to take your head out of the Sand...




http://100777.com/node/638
More on the Port Arthur Massacre and their patsy.

Forwarded is one of the most bizarre events of the recent past. Its facts were so muted and disguised as to make the entire issue, hardly plausible. Yet, the event happened, and the Gun issue in Australia emerged.... The similar event in Scotland can easily fit into the same category ..as unsolved, or at least why these people did what they did...JRN


Was Port Arthur Designed to Undermine our National Security ?

It is an accepted media "fact" that Martin Bryant, an intellectually- impaired young man with a dramatically low IQ of 66, shot dead 35 people at Port Arthur and wounded 22 others.

Not just that, but this awesome shooter managed to kill the first 19 out of 20 dead in the Broad Arrow Cafe with single accurate shots to the head fired from his right hip.

Not bad for a man with no firearm experience other than using a Webley Osprey air rifle when he was a boy, and by the way, Bryant used to fire the Webley from his left shoulder because he is and has always been left- handed.

Perhaps the media should have questioned this startling inconsistency but failed to do so. After all, the suspect was in custody, international media outlets were screaming for the "dramatic" story, and somehow Martin Bryant's increasingly desperate pleas of "Not Guilty" were ignored by all and sundry.

Why? Perhaps because the Tasmanian Government was already aware that there was absolutely no evidence of any kind linking Bryant to Port Arthur, and needed a media "conviction" to protect their exposed political hides. And so it was that Martin Bryant became the most vilified and hated man in Australia, with thousands calling for his immediate execution.

BEFORE YOU RUSH TO JUDGEMENT ON PORT ARTHUR, TAKE A HARD LOOK AT THE QUEEN v. MARTIN BRYANT, AND TRY TO ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS TO YOUR SATISFACTION. IT IS UNLIKELY YOU WILL BE ABLE TO DO SO.

--- 1 Two hours before the mass murder commenced at Port Arthur, all senior site personnel were collected and driven north to a management seminar more than two hours from the Historic Site. In practice, this meant that at the time of the mass murder, no experienced managers were available at the Port Arthur Site. A residential weekend management seminar had never happened before in the entire history of Port Arthur.

WHO ISSUED THIS EXTRAORDINARY ORDER ?

--- 2 One hour before the massacre commenced at Port Arthur, the only two armed policemen on the Tasman Peninsula were decoyed on an imaginary drugs bust, to a coal mine location 30 minutes drive away from Port Arthur. Within minutes of these officers reporting themselves on location at the coal mine by radio, the shooter opened fire in the Broad Arrow Cafe. Timed from the point at which shot number one was fired, the entire massacre was completed in 17 minutes elapsed tim, meaning armed police could not intervene.

WHO DECOYED THE ARMED POLICE OFFICERS ?

--- 3 The shooter entered the Broad Arrow Cafe carrying his weapons in a Prince sports bag, then left the empty sports bag in a prominent position to later "link" the murders to Martin Bryant. Problem! The Colt Commando AR15 later found by police at Seascape Cottage and claimed to be "Bryant's Murder Weapon", has a standard 14.5" barrel, making it far too long to fit into the Prince sports bag. The weapon removed from the sports bag in the Broad Arrow Cafe by the real shooter had a barrel no longer than ten inches. Where is the shortened AR15 actually used in the mass murder?

--- 4 After the mass murder, police were attracted to Seascape Cottage by a tall plume of smoke from a burning BMW in the yard. Martin Bryant remembers a BMW car but is adamant he does not remember setting fire to it, because a man was secured in the boot, or so he believed. Bryant was [Glenn Pears] was removed before the car was set on fire, and later shot dead inside Seascape Cottage. Was the car set on fire merely to destroy forensic evidence, or was it [like the Prince sports bag in the Broad Arrow Cafe], used as another 'link' to incriminate Martin Bryant ?

--- 5 Immediately after being taken into custody and while being treated at the Royal Hobart Hospital, Martin Bryant was able to easily converse with his captors, confirm he understood their questions, and plead "not guilty". How was this possible? If Bryant had been inside the Broad Arrow Cafe during the mass murder, the concussive blast of 20x.223 Remington rounds fired by an AR15 with a shortened barrel, would have severely damaged his hearing. Most survivors in the cafe were hearing impaired for weeks, and some had burst eardrums. Even the, only the shooter him self was subject to the full reflected concussive blast of all 29 rounds. This medical fact alone excludes Martin Bryant from the Broad Arrow Cafe, so who really did the shooting?

J.Vials

Yes that Right, for all of you who DONT RESEARCH YOUR SELVES
Former VICTORIAN POLICE OFFICER confirms Martin Briant DID NOT DO PORT ARTHER, Do you feel Safer now? Knowing there has at least been a COVER UP on why AUSTRALIA REMOVED GUNS FROM ITS OWN PEOPLE!???

Serving, Assisting, A FOREIGN POWER or having Intention that Manifests with an Overt Act is TREASON

Elizabeth II (Elizabeth Alexandra Mary, born 21 April 1926^{[N 1]}) is the constitutional monarch of sixteen independent sovereign states known as the Commonwealth realms.^{[N 2]} In addition, as Head of the Commonwealth, she is the figurehead of the 54-member Commonwealth of Nations and, as the British monarch, she is the Supreme Governor of the Church of England.

Elizabeth was educated privately at home. Her father, George VI, became King-Emperor of the British Empire in 1936. She began to undertake public duties during the Second World War, in which she served in the Auxiliary Territorial Service. After the war and Indian independence George VI's title of Emperor of India was abandoned, and the evolution of the Empire into the Commonwealth accelerated. In 1947, Elizabeth made the first of many tours around the Commonwealth, and married Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. They have four children: Charles, Anne, Andrew, and Edward.

In 1949, George VI became the first Head of the Commonwealth, a "symbol of the free association" of the independent countries comprising the Commonwealth of Nations.^[1] On his death in 1952, Elizabeth became Head of the Commonwealth, and queen of seven independent Commonwealth countries: the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon. Her coronation in 1953 was the first to be televised. During her reign, which at 59 years is one of the longest for a British monarch, she became queen of 25 other countries within the Commonwealth as they gained independence. Between 1956 and 1992, half of her realms, including South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon (renamed Sri Lanka), became republics.

In 1992, which Elizabeth termed her annus horribilis ("horrible year"), two of her sons separated from their wives, her daughter divorced, and a severe fire destroyed part of Windsor Castle. Revelations on the state of her eldest son Charles's marriage continued, and he divorced in 1996. The following year, her former daughter-in-law Diana, Princess of Wales, died in a car crash in Paris. The media criticised the royal family for remaining in seclusion in the days before Diana's funeral, but Elizabeth's personal popularity rebounded once she had appeared in public and has since remained high. Her Silver and Golden Jubilees were celebrated in 1977 and 2002; planning for her Diamond Jubilee in 2012 is underway.

The Diamond Jubilee is where she will hand over the crown corporation, or shortly after that to Prince William who is already a member of the Bar, and Bench, Army, Navy, Air force in the UK and Canada

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_William_of_Wales

Subsection 44(i) asserts that any person "under any acknowledgement of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power" is not eligible to stand for Parliament. This has generally been interpreted as meaning that persons with dual citizenship are not permitted to stand.

Sue v Hill At the 1998 federal election, Heather Hill, a woman with dual British-Australian citizenship was elected to the Australian Senate as a senator for Queensland. Henry Sue, a voter from Queensland, appealed to the High Court of Australia, sitting in its capacity as the Court of Disputed Returns. Chief Justice Murray Gleeson ruled that the United Kingdom qualified as a "foreign power" under section 44(i), and as Hill was a British citizen was therefore unable to take up her Senate seat

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_44_of_the_Australian_Constitution

If the Queen of England "UNITED KINGDOM FOREIGN POWER BRITISH CITIZEN" as stated by LAW in Australia's HIGHEST COURT, has Governors, Politicians, Police, Judges and Military all Swear an OATH of LOYALTY, SUBMISSION, and OBEDIENCE to a FOREIGN POWER
How can people say that is not TREASON?

Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Australia and Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth.

By the Grace of the Papal Coronation ? Foreign Power United Kingdom Citizenship is still Treason...

http://shundrallah.blogspot.com/2011/02/crown-treason.html

Section 80.1 of the Criminal Code, contained in the schedule of the Criminal Code Act 1995, defines treason as follows:
(f) engages in conduct that assists by any means whatever, with intent to assist:

(i) another country; or
(ii) an organisation;
(h) forms an intention to do any act referred to in a preceding paragraph and manifests that intention by an overt act."

Making an Oath to a Foreign power as Established by the High Court of Australia is TREASON

So why is this happening ? MAN MADE ANUNNAKI GOD VIA THE POPE GAVE THE QUEEN THE ABILITY TO DISCOVER AUSTRALIA, AND OTHER NATIONS FORCED IN TO SLAVERY!
http://shundrallah.blogspot.com/2011/02/roman-pontiff-key-bearer-father-grants.html


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dum_Diversas
"We grant you [Kings of Spain and Portugal] by these present documents, with our Apostolic Authority, full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be, as well as their kingdoms, duchies, counties, principalities, and other property [...] and to reduce their persons into perpetual slavery.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanus_Pontifex
The Roman pontiff, successor of the key-bearer of the heavenly kingdom and vicar of Jesus Christ, contemplating with a father's mind all the several climes of the world and the characteristics of all the nations dwelling in them and seeking and desiring the salvation of all, wholesomely ordains and disposes upon careful deliberation those things which he sees will be agreeable to the Divine Majesty and by which he may bring the sheep entrusted to him by God into the single divine fold, and may acquire for them the reward of eternal felicity, and obtain pardon for their souls. This we believe will more certainly come to pass, through the aid of the Lord, if we bestow suitable favors and special graces on those Catholic kings and princes, who, like athletes and intrepid champions of the Christian faith, as we know by the evidence of facts, not only restrain the savage excesses of the Saracens and of other infidels, enemies of the Christian name, but also for the defense and increase of the faith vanquish them and their kingdoms and habitations, though situated in the remotest parts unknown to us, and subject them to their own temporal dominion, sparing no labor and expense, in order that those kings and princes, relieved of all obstacles, may be the more animated to the prosecution of so salutary and laudable a work.

...to conserve their right and possession, [the said king and infante] under certain most severe penalties then expressed, have prohibited and in general have ordained that none, unless with their sailors and ships and on payment of a certain tribute and with an express license previously obtained from the said king or infante, should presume to sail to the said provinces or to trade in their ports or to fish in the sea,

...since we had formerly by other letters of ours granted among other things free and ample faculty to the aforesaid King Alfonso -- to invade, search out, capture, vanquish, and subdue all Saracens and pagans whatsoever, and other enemies of Christ wheresoever placed, and the kingdoms, dukedoms, principalities, dominions, possessions, and all movable and immovable goods whatsoever held and possessed by them and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery, and to apply and appropriate to himself and his successors the kingdoms, dukedoms, counties, principalities, dominions, possessions, and goods, and to convert them to his and their use and profit -- by having secured the said faculty, the said King Alfonso, or, by his authority, the aforesaid infante, justly and lawfully has acquired and possessed, and doth possess, these islands, lands, harbors, and seas, and they do of right belong and pertain to the said King Alfonso and his successors, nor without special license from King Alfonso and his successors themselves has any other even of the faithful of Christ been entitled hitherto, nor is he by any means now entitled lawfully to meddle therewith.

THIS IS THE LAW ! THIS IS THE REASON A FOREIGN POWER DEMANDS OATHS OF LOYALTY AND IS IMMUNE TO TREASON "Immune by the Loyal System Baring you access", THE SAME "LAW OF DISCOVERY" COMPELS THOSE SERVING THIS MAN MADE LAW TO invade, search out, capture, vanquish, and subdue all and the kingdoms, dukedoms, principalities, dominions, possessions, and all movable and immovable goods whatsoever held and possessed by them and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery

Movable and Immovable Goods are also Knowledge, Wisdom, Consciousness, Awareness, Language, Technology, Spirituality, Shamanic-Dreamtime-Ancestors Culture

TR-3B

http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/rrat_ctte/completed_inquiries/2004-07/oil_supply/submissions/sub08.pdf
Searched the Australian Gov Website, they have this "Completed Inquiry in to the TR-3B" along with some other Advanced Technologies, this document is worth a read for the links it gives to ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT KNOWS ABOUT

Australian Trial By Jury, Section 80 of the CONSTITUTION

80. The trial on indictment of any offence against any law of the Commonwealth shall be by jury, and every such trial shall be held in the State where the offence was committed, and if the offence was not committed within any State the trial shall be held at such place or places as the Parliament prescribes
http://aph.gov.au/senate/general/constitution/chapter3.htm

If you no your Right, See to it your Peers no your right, and dont Plea to the Judge Agreeing to Something when you no you didnt do wrong... DEMAND TO BE TRIED BY YOUR PEERS


Then in-front of your peers, ask the Judge to Clarify for everyone there that day his OATH fo a FOREIGN QUEEN then Quote the Treason Laws, and ask the Bailiff to Arrest the Judge...
"Same with the Police they make an Oath to a Foreign English Person"
http://shundrallah.blogspot.com/2011/02/crown-treason.html

FIRE WATER: Australia's Industrial Fluoridation Disgrace