Context, Syntax

Context, Syntax

If 100 is compared to 75
The context, Syntax Defines the % Ratio
100 Dropping to 75 is a 25% loss
75 increasing to 100 is a 33.3% gain
75 is 75% of 100
100 is 100% of 100
Now if the Origin point is 100 then 75 increasing back to 100 is the same 100 Origin point and 0% change
If 75 is the Origin point then 100 decreasing to 75 is back to the same 75 origin point and 0% change again

This is where it gets tricky, Without Direction only a Focus point all possibilities are relevant
If 100 is the point of origin then 75 is seen as
25% loss or -25%, 33.3% gain or +33.3%, 75%, and both 75 and 100 are seen as 0% change to there own state regardless of the origin
If 75 is the Point of Origin then 100 is seen as
25% loss or -25%, 33.3% gain or +33.3%, 75%, and both 75 and 100 are seen as 0% change to there own state regardless of the origin

The Real Tricky part is in the use of Combination, Separation, and Multiplication...
100 can be Added, Subtracted, Multiplied, or Divided by 75
75 can be added, subtracted, multiplied, or divided by 100
The % these Ratios give are going to blow your mind, remember same Variables 75 and 100, yet Context and Syntax changed
100 added to 75 is 175 = +75% and 175%
100 subtracted from 75 is -25 = -125% or subtract 75 is 25 = 25%
100 Multiplied by 75 is 7500 = 7500% or +7400%
100 divided by 75 is 1.33 = 1.33%

75 Added to 100 is 175 = +75% and 175%
75 Subtracted from 100 is 25 = 25%
75 multiplied by 100 is 7500 = 7500% or +7400%
75 Divided by 100 = .75 or 1%

So just from the Simple Application of Mathematical Context, Syntax to 75 and 100 has resulted in % variables between -125% , to 7500%
If the Directional Context, Syntax is lost or misplaced but the % variable is retained then mixed with other syntax or Context's the Entire Perception Generated is Defective... and Hazardous...

If we add just one piece of Directional Focus to explain Context, Syntax Direction is Understood
A Point of origin dose not give the other Value a point of reference and so all its possible relationships are relevant
This means that the Relevance of DEPTH Perception Graded in an Orderly Understandable Fashion is the core or Syntax, Context
The Ability to Linguistically Communicate Syntax and Context Effectively is the core of Effective Translation

Without the relationship between values explained a point of origin : is like your home "point of origin" and if your at a different location and lost with no known relationship between the points all Possibilities are relevant yet irrelevant at the same time, until the relationship between points is explained and understood only then will the clear picture of different locations be one set obvious Context, Syntax rather then the mass of possible yet irrelevant uses of syntax, context without any factual or tangible variables that can correlate such a syntax, context Reinforcement or reliability over the other possibilities, nor rule the others out

a point of origin : is also like the amount of $ your house costs, while your current $ is different yet no context or syntax has been established are you still saving for the house so its a future point/plan/dream, or is it long in the past, It is being purchased, or sold? telling someone "house X$ i got y$ dose nothing to explain how the values relate

However if the Directional focus is taken to be irrelevant as in the use of semantics, Or Statistical Tricks then the (+/-) % is used to mask the underlying goal and the true intentional Context, Syntax Direction is being obfuscated through deliberate miss-perception reinforcement



Every Day, the Media, Advertising, Politics, Education, and Religions use a Mish-Mash of Spaghetti Syntax, Context to Confuse, Dumb-Down, and Program the Re-Education of Society to Parrot and Conform to Hypocrisy through CONSENSUS

This is why the Analysts, Intelligence operatives, Independent Critical thinkers who have the Intelligence, focus and will-power to find-out and understand are not so easy to SENSE CON like the rest of US